<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (6) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289104</link>
    <description>The court decreed the appeal in favor of the plaintiff regarding specific shares of lands and properties transferred under the deed. The court dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s claim to certain properties while awarding costs to the appellants. In Appeal No. 1302 of 1923, the court dismissed the appeal and cross-objection, affirming the plaintiffs&#039; entitlement to Lajman&#039;s interest in the properties under the deed. Respondents 1 and 2 were awarded costs of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (6) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289104</link>
      <description>The court decreed the appeal in favor of the plaintiff regarding specific shares of lands and properties transferred under the deed. The court dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s claim to certain properties while awarding costs to the appellants. In Appeal No. 1302 of 1923, the court dismissed the appeal and cross-objection, affirming the plaintiffs&#039; entitlement to Lajman&#039;s interest in the properties under the deed. Respondents 1 and 2 were awarded costs of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>