https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289103 The court affirmed the decree of the Senior Subordinate Judge, holding that Mt. Rani was entitled to succeed to the whole of the property left by Mt. Mughlani Bibi. The court dismissed the appeal with costs, concluding that the plaintiffs' suit was within limitation and that the appellants had not displaced Mt. Rani's title to the property. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:15:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289103 The court affirmed the decree of the Senior Subordinate Judge, holding that Mt. Rani was entitled to succeed to the whole of the property left by Mt. Mughlani Bibi. The court dismissed the appeal with costs, concluding that the plaintiffs' suit was within limitation and that the appellants had not displaced Mt. Rani's title to the property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Dec 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289103