<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (3) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289100</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that a transaction involving the exchange of immovable property for dower is considered a sale and requires registration under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act. The court rejected the argument that the transaction should be governed by personal laws, affirming that it falls under British laws. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (3) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289100</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that a transaction involving the exchange of immovable property for dower is considered a sale and requires registration under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act. The court rejected the argument that the transaction should be governed by personal laws, affirming that it falls under British laws. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>