https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289098 The High Court at Rangoon held that there was no legal evidence of the contents of the divorce document, leading to the reversal of the District Court's decree. The court emphasized the requirement for direct oral evidence from witnesses who have seen the document's contents. Since the witnesses had not read the divorce document, their statements were considered hearsay. The judges found the evidence of oral divorce under Mahomedan Law unreliable and insufficient. The Privy Council affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the plaintiff regarding the validity of the divorce. en-us Tue, 30 Nov 1926 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289098 The High Court at Rangoon held that there was no legal evidence of the contents of the divorce document, leading to the reversal of the District Court's decree. The court emphasized the requirement for direct oral evidence from witnesses who have seen the document's contents. Since the witnesses had not read the divorce document, their statements were considered hearsay. The judges found the evidence of oral divorce under Mahomedan Law unreliable and insufficient. The Privy Council affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the plaintiff regarding the validity of the divorce. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Nov 1926 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289098