<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 12 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22741</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act and the consequential letter due to insufficient disclosure of grounds for reassessment and inadequate justification based on a legal judgment cited by the Revenue. The lack of valid information for reopening assessments under section 147(b) rendered the process legally unsound, leading the court to rule in favor of the petitioners in challenging the reassessment for the assessment year 1977-78.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 12 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22741</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act and the consequential letter due to insufficient disclosure of grounds for reassessment and inadequate justification based on a legal judgment cited by the Revenue. The lack of valid information for reopening assessments under section 147(b) rendered the process legally unsound, leading the court to rule in favor of the petitioners in challenging the reassessment for the assessment year 1977-78.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>