<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 319 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396650</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Hyderabad held that no CENVAT credit is admissible to the appellant for outward transportation of goods to the buyer&#039;s premises, in line with Apex Court precedents and the interpretation of CENVAT Credit Rules. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of CENVAT credit on transportation services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:19:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 319 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396650</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Hyderabad held that no CENVAT credit is admissible to the appellant for outward transportation of goods to the buyer&#039;s premises, in line with Apex Court precedents and the interpretation of CENVAT Credit Rules. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of CENVAT credit on transportation services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>