<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 318 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396649</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of electrical transformers. The dispute centered on the valuation of excisable goods for duty calculation, specifically determining the &quot;place of removal&quot; under the Central Excise Act. The judgment clarified that the seller&#039;s premises should be considered the place of removal for duty calculation, even in cases where the place of delivery is the buyer&#039;s premises. This decision aligned with established legal principles and precedents, providing clarity on excisable goods&#039; valuation based on the place of removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 318 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396649</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of electrical transformers. The dispute centered on the valuation of excisable goods for duty calculation, specifically determining the &quot;place of removal&quot; under the Central Excise Act. The judgment clarified that the seller&#039;s premises should be considered the place of removal for duty calculation, even in cases where the place of delivery is the buyer&#039;s premises. This decision aligned with established legal principles and precedents, providing clarity on excisable goods&#039; valuation based on the place of removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>