<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption benefits under Notification No. 12/2012-CE for the appellant, confirming the central excise duty demand. It also upheld the decision to drop the demand for reversal of Cenvat credit, finding no substantive evidence to challenge the appellant&#039;s maintenance of separate records for inputs used in non-taxable goods/services. Both the appellant&#039;s and the Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption benefits under Notification No. 12/2012-CE for the appellant, confirming the central excise duty demand. It also upheld the decision to drop the demand for reversal of Cenvat credit, finding no substantive evidence to challenge the appellant&#039;s maintenance of separate records for inputs used in non-taxable goods/services. Both the appellant&#039;s and the Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>