<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 316 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order confirming the confiscation of cash and dismissed the appeal challenging the adjustment of the confiscated cash towards duty liability. The Tribunal determined that the confiscated cash could not be used to offset the appellant&#039;s tax liabilities and must be considered as property vested with the government. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi, pronounced the judgment on 13.07.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 316 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order confirming the confiscation of cash and dismissed the appeal challenging the adjustment of the confiscated cash towards duty liability. The Tribunal determined that the confiscated cash could not be used to offset the appellant&#039;s tax liabilities and must be considered as property vested with the government. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi, pronounced the judgment on 13.07.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>