https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289093 The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant was a benamidar for the suit properties and that the sale consideration was paid by the plaintiff. Due to lack of evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims, the court dismissed the suit and ruled in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff was not entitled to any relief, and the appeal was dismissed with costs upheld from the lower court's decision. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:56:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289093 The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant was a benamidar for the suit properties and that the sale consideration was paid by the plaintiff. Due to lack of evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims, the court dismissed the suit and ruled in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff was not entitled to any relief, and the appeal was dismissed with costs upheld from the lower court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289093