<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2007 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed both appeals by way of remand. The decision aimed to address the duty demand issue on the complete Canopy, the exemption claimed after a specific date, and the concerns regarding Cenvat credit maintenance and liability. The remand provided an opportunity for a fresh decision, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2007 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed both appeals by way of remand. The decision aimed to address the duty demand issue on the complete Canopy, the exemption claimed after a specific date, and the concerns regarding Cenvat credit maintenance and liability. The remand provided an opportunity for a fresh decision, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>