https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289085 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them possession of the premises and mesne profits. The lease, which allowed for various uses including dwelling and ordinary business purposes, was not solely for manufacturing as argued by the defense. The court emphasized that manufacturing involves producing new articles and that the purpose of the lease at its inception is crucial. As the lease did not explicitly specify manufacturing purposes, the court found in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendant to pay mesne profits and allowing a grace period before executing the decree. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:54:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289085 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them possession of the premises and mesne profits. The lease, which allowed for various uses including dwelling and ordinary business purposes, was not solely for manufacturing as argued by the defense. The court emphasized that manufacturing involves producing new articles and that the purpose of the lease at its inception is crucial. As the lease did not explicitly specify manufacturing purposes, the court found in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendant to pay mesne profits and allowing a grace period before executing the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289085