https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289083 The High Court allowed the revision application, condoned the delay in filing the compensation claim petition, and ordered the restoration of the claim petition for expeditious hearing. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in not condoning the delay, misinterpreted the evidence, and criticized the conduct of public authorities in raising technical pleas. The delay was attributed to the petitioner's illness and lack of proper guidance, with no negligence or mala fides on her part. The petition was allowed without any order as to costs. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:49:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289083 The High Court allowed the revision application, condoned the delay in filing the compensation claim petition, and ordered the restoration of the claim petition for expeditious hearing. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in not condoning the delay, misinterpreted the evidence, and criticized the conduct of public authorities in raising technical pleas. The delay was attributed to the petitioner's illness and lack of proper guidance, with no negligence or mala fides on her part. The petition was allowed without any order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289083