<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 113 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289081</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;rent&quot; in the exemption clause was confined to the contractual rent agreed in the registered lease deed. Additional municipal tax paid by the tenant could not be treated as rent where the deed did not make it part of the consideration for the demise, and a later oral arrangement or course of conduct could not vary the registered instrument for purposes of the Act. The right to recover excess tax under the statute remained distinct from any contractual agreement on rent. Accordingly, the extra tax payment was excluded from the rent calculation, the monthly rent stayed below the statutory ceiling, and the Rent Controller retained jurisdiction to hear the fair rent application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 113 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289081</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;rent&quot; in the exemption clause was confined to the contractual rent agreed in the registered lease deed. Additional municipal tax paid by the tenant could not be treated as rent where the deed did not make it part of the consideration for the demise, and a later oral arrangement or course of conduct could not vary the registered instrument for purposes of the Act. The right to recover excess tax under the statute remained distinct from any contractual agreement on rent. Accordingly, the extra tax payment was excluded from the rent calculation, the monthly rent stayed below the statutory ceiling, and the Rent Controller retained jurisdiction to hear the fair rent application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>