<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 305 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit the depreciation claim on Content Management Software (CMS) owned and used by the assessee. The alternate claim for treating the expenditure as revenue under section 37(1) was not addressed as the depreciation claim was allowed. The decision in favor of the assessee was pronounced on 08.07.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 305 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit the depreciation claim on Content Management Software (CMS) owned and used by the assessee. The alternate claim for treating the expenditure as revenue under section 37(1) was not addressed as the depreciation claim was allowed. The decision in favor of the assessee was pronounced on 08.07.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>