<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 301 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the second notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was premature and lacked jurisdiction, resulting in the quashing of the reassessment order. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objection was allowed. The decision underscored the necessity of completing reassessment proceedings before issuing additional notices under section 148, reinforcing adherence to due process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 301 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the second notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was premature and lacked jurisdiction, resulting in the quashing of the reassessment order. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objection was allowed. The decision underscored the necessity of completing reassessment proceedings before issuing additional notices under section 148, reinforcing adherence to due process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>