<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22734</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court, in a case involving the interpretation of the first proviso to section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act and the allowance of weighted deduction under section 35B, ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s disallowance of a portion of the director&#039;s salary and perquisites for both the assessment years 1977-78 and 1979-80. It affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that specific expenses related to export activities were eligible for weighted deduction, but not all claimed items. The court concluded that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction on the cost of cartons under section 35B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22734</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court, in a case involving the interpretation of the first proviso to section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act and the allowance of weighted deduction under section 35B, ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s disallowance of a portion of the director&#039;s salary and perquisites for both the assessment years 1977-78 and 1979-80. It affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that specific expenses related to export activities were eligible for weighted deduction, but not all claimed items. The court concluded that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction on the cost of cartons under section 35B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>