<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Denies Request to Rectify Non-Obvious Typo Error; Cum-Tax-Benefit Plea Not Raised in Appeal Grounds.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54006</link>
    <description>Rectification of mistake - typographical order - The mistake as alleged is not at all self evident, hence cannot be called as error apparent on record. As for as the plea of cum-tax-benefit is concerned, the plea has not been raised in grounds of appeal. The allegation that the same was not considered by this Tribunal despite been submitted is, therefore, not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Denies Request to Rectify Non-Obvious Typo Error; Cum-Tax-Benefit Plea Not Raised in Appeal Grounds.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54006</link>
      <description>Rectification of mistake - typographical order - The mistake as alleged is not at all self evident, hence cannot be called as error apparent on record. As for as the plea of cum-tax-benefit is concerned, the plea has not been raised in grounds of appeal. The allegation that the same was not considered by this Tribunal despite been submitted is, therefore, not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>