https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396625 The tribunal allowed the typographical correction in para-8 of the final order but rejected other requests for rectification. The judgment emphasized that rectification is limited to self-evident mistakes, not requiring further deliberation. The tribunal cited legal precedents to support its decision and highlighted its duty to correct mistakes where issues have been argued but not considered in the order. The application for rectification was partly allowed on 15.01.2020. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396625 The tribunal allowed the typographical correction in para-8 of the final order but rejected other requests for rectification. The judgment emphasized that rectification is limited to self-evident mistakes, not requiring further deliberation. The tribunal cited legal precedents to support its decision and highlighted its duty to correct mistakes where issues have been argued but not considered in the order. The application for rectification was partly allowed on 15.01.2020. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396625