<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 292 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified a mistake in the Final Order concerning the tax demand amount, correcting it to the accurate sum of Rs. 4,10,40,683. The appellant&#039;s Rectification of Mistake application was allowed, with the Tribunal condoning the delay based on valid reasons. The decision aligned with Supreme Court interpretations, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s authority to rectify orders for justice, regardless of limitation periods. The ruling underscored that subsequent detailed judgments override earlier decisions without reasoning, rendering them non-binding. Both rectification and delay condonation applications were granted, providing the appellant with rightful benefits under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 292 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified a mistake in the Final Order concerning the tax demand amount, correcting it to the accurate sum of Rs. 4,10,40,683. The appellant&#039;s Rectification of Mistake application was allowed, with the Tribunal condoning the delay based on valid reasons. The decision aligned with Supreme Court interpretations, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s authority to rectify orders for justice, regardless of limitation periods. The ruling underscored that subsequent detailed judgments override earlier decisions without reasoning, rendering them non-binding. Both rectification and delay condonation applications were granted, providing the appellant with rightful benefits under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>