<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 53 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that income derived from the sale of agricultural land is not taxable as capital gains but constitutes agricultural income. The court emphasized that retrospective amendments to the Income-tax Act must be considered, even when deciding on applications made before the amendment. The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the questions of law to it, taking into account the retrospective amendment to section 2(1A) by the Finance Act, 1989.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 53 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that income derived from the sale of agricultural land is not taxable as capital gains but constitutes agricultural income. The court emphasized that retrospective amendments to the Income-tax Act must be considered, even when deciding on applications made before the amendment. The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the questions of law to it, taking into account the retrospective amendment to section 2(1A) by the Finance Act, 1989.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>