<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 129 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289072</link>
    <description>The court held that the tenancy rights could not be transferred without the landlord&#039;s consent under the Delhi Rent Control Act. The Official Liquidator&#039;s application to sell the tenancy rights was dismissed, with no costs awarded. The court affirmed that the sale by the Liquidator is not a transfer by operation of law, emphasizing the distinction between transfers requiring parties&#039; actions and those occurring automatically.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:10:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 129 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289072</link>
      <description>The court held that the tenancy rights could not be transferred without the landlord&#039;s consent under the Delhi Rent Control Act. The Official Liquidator&#039;s application to sell the tenancy rights was dismissed, with no costs awarded. The court affirmed that the sale by the Liquidator is not a transfer by operation of law, emphasizing the distinction between transfers requiring parties&#039; actions and those occurring automatically.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>