<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 266 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396597</link>
    <description>Challenge concerned rejection of an application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, where the applicant disputed the grounds of incomplete quantification of tax liability, pending investigation, alleged ineligibility, and absence of hearing. The HC issued notice and directed filing of counter-affidavit and rejoinder, with the matter listed for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 266 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396597</link>
      <description>Challenge concerned rejection of an application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, where the applicant disputed the grounds of incomplete quantification of tax liability, pending investigation, alleged ineligibility, and absence of hearing. The HC issued notice and directed filing of counter-affidavit and rejoinder, with the matter listed for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>