<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 265 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that the charges paid to Intelsat were for the lease of space segment capacity and not for broadcasting services. As a result, the Appellant was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for the relevant period. The appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 265 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that the charges paid to Intelsat were for the lease of space segment capacity and not for broadcasting services. As a result, the Appellant was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for the relevant period. The appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>