<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22724</link>
    <description>Recovery proceedings cannot be sustained where the assessment forming their foundation has already been quashed. The Bombay High Court noted that once the underlying assessment order was set aside and further recovery steps pursuant to it were directed not to be taken, the demand lost its legal basis. In such circumstances, enforcement of the recovery notice against the petitioner could not continue because the demand depended entirely on a non-existent assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22724</link>
      <description>Recovery proceedings cannot be sustained where the assessment forming their foundation has already been quashed. The Bombay High Court noted that once the underlying assessment order was set aside and further recovery steps pursuant to it were directed not to be taken, the demand lost its legal basis. In such circumstances, enforcement of the recovery notice against the petitioner could not continue because the demand depended entirely on a non-existent assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>