<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1369 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289068</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal condoned a 12-day delay in filing the appeal and disposed of the condonation application. On the merits, the dispute concerned whether transactions, including the sale of a car, were undervalued or fraudulent under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal noted that the Adjudicating Authority had already examined the liquidator&#039;s application under Sections 35(1)(n), 45 and 66 and found no undervalued or fraudulent transaction. In appeal, the Tribunal declined to reappreciate that factual finding or reopen the issue, leaving the impugned order undisturbed and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 15:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1369 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289068</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal condoned a 12-day delay in filing the appeal and disposed of the condonation application. On the merits, the dispute concerned whether transactions, including the sale of a car, were undervalued or fraudulent under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal noted that the Adjudicating Authority had already examined the liquidator&#039;s application under Sections 35(1)(n), 45 and 66 and found no undervalued or fraudulent transaction. In appeal, the Tribunal declined to reappreciate that factual finding or reopen the issue, leaving the impugned order undisturbed and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>