<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 128 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22721</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled that the tax effect in the case did not exceed Rs. 8,500 per year, falling below the threshold of Rs. 30,000 set by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Therefore, the court discharged the rule with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:19:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 128 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22721</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled that the tax effect in the case did not exceed Rs. 8,500 per year, falling below the threshold of Rs. 30,000 set by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Therefore, the court discharged the rule with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>