<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289063</link>
    <description>A voidable agreement among the legal representatives of a deceased educational agency remains operative and binding until set aside in competent civil proceedings, so it could not be ignored in collateral proceedings. On the death of an individual educational agency, management rights devolve on all legal representatives, and a majority arrangement could validly appoint a Manager unless a corporate educational agency was lawfully constituted. Objections that the proposed Manager was illiterate or physically incapable failed because the authority found literacy and no material showed mental unfitness; the approval of the fifth respondent as Manager was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289063</link>
      <description>A voidable agreement among the legal representatives of a deceased educational agency remains operative and binding until set aside in competent civil proceedings, so it could not be ignored in collateral proceedings. On the death of an individual educational agency, management rights devolve on all legal representatives, and a majority arrangement could validly appoint a Manager unless a corporate educational agency was lawfully constituted. Objections that the proposed Manager was illiterate or physically incapable failed because the authority found literacy and no material showed mental unfitness; the approval of the fifth respondent as Manager was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>