<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 241 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions of Rs. 33.37 Lacs for the sale of shares and Rs. 17.40 Lacs for the sale of jewelry. The Tribunal found the sale of shares genuine, supported by broker bills and bank statements, and the jewelry sale consistent with customary gifts. The additions were quashed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 241 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions of Rs. 33.37 Lacs for the sale of shares and Rs. 17.40 Lacs for the sale of jewelry. The Tribunal found the sale of shares genuine, supported by broker bills and bank statements, and the jewelry sale consistent with customary gifts. The additions were quashed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>