https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289062 A mortgage created during the pendency of litigation concerning immovable property remained subject to the doctrine of lis pendens under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act because the property was directly in issue in the suit. The operation of section 52 did not depend on the ultimate strength of the parties' claims, and a compromise decree made in the suit could still determine rights affecting the property. The compromise terms here did not clearly displace that statutory effect or confer priority on the mortgage, so the mortgage remained subordinate to the rights created by the decree. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:00:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289062 A mortgage created during the pendency of litigation concerning immovable property remained subject to the doctrine of lis pendens under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act because the property was directly in issue in the suit. The operation of section 52 did not depend on the ultimate strength of the parties' claims, and a compromise decree made in the suit could still determine rights affecting the property. The compromise terms here did not clearly displace that statutory effect or confer priority on the mortgage, so the mortgage remained subordinate to the rights created by the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Apr 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289062