https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289062 The Privy Council affirmed the High Court's decision regarding the interpretation of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in a case involving a mortgage executed during a lawsuit. The Board emphasized the preservation of rights during litigation, regardless of registration status, and upheld that a compromise decree can align with Section 52 even if it extends beyond the original claim. The appellant's mortgage was found not to have priority over the compromise agreement, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs awarded due to the non-appearance of the respondents. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:00:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289062 The Privy Council affirmed the High Court's decision regarding the interpretation of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in a case involving a mortgage executed during a lawsuit. The Board emphasized the preservation of rights during litigation, regardless of registration status, and upheld that a compromise decree can align with Section 52 even if it extends beyond the original claim. The appellant's mortgage was found not to have priority over the compromise agreement, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs awarded due to the non-appearance of the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Apr 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289062