https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289061 An administrative authority cannot continue or renew an employee's suspension in defiance of a final judicial direction requiring reconsideration after earlier suspension orders were quashed. Orders made contrary to a binding tribunal decision are void, arbitrary, and tainted by legal malice; file notings alone do not amount to an executable government decision. Suspension remains an interim measure, but it must be supported by proper application of mind, relevant public-interest grounds, and mandatory review. Where the authority disregards review requirements and gives no proper reasons, judicial interference is justified and the impugned suspension orders are unsustainable. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:59:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289061 An administrative authority cannot continue or renew an employee's suspension in defiance of a final judicial direction requiring reconsideration after earlier suspension orders were quashed. Orders made contrary to a binding tribunal decision are void, arbitrary, and tainted by legal malice; file notings alone do not amount to an executable government decision. Suspension remains an interim measure, but it must be supported by proper application of mind, relevant public-interest grounds, and mandatory review. Where the authority disregards review requirements and gives no proper reasons, judicial interference is justified and the impugned suspension orders are unsustainable. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289061