<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 230 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396561</link>
    <description>Entitlement to C forms for inter-State purchase of High Speed Diesel was treated as already settled by an earlier order that had been upheld in appeal, and the court applied that binding outcome to the petitioner&#039;s request. On that basis, the prayer for issuance of C forms under the Central Sales Tax regime was accepted and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 230 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396561</link>
      <description>Entitlement to C forms for inter-State purchase of High Speed Diesel was treated as already settled by an earlier order that had been upheld in appeal, and the court applied that binding outcome to the petitioner&#039;s request. On that basis, the prayer for issuance of C forms under the Central Sales Tax regime was accepted and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>