https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289057 Inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to vary or reopen a decree after the original appeal has been finally disposed of; any challenge to the post-remand decree required a fresh, validly instituted appeal under the governing constitutional appellate provision, so the application was not entertainable for want of jurisdiction. On court-fee, a plaint seeking damages for wrongful dismissal or, alternatively, arrears of pay was treated as alternative reliefs on the same cause of action, not as two distinct causes of action. Court-fee was therefore to be assessed on the alternative-relief basis, with fixed fee on the declaratory relief and ad valorem fee on the higher alternative claim. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 1942 00:00:00 +0630 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:35:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289057 Inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to vary or reopen a decree after the original appeal has been finally disposed of; any challenge to the post-remand decree required a fresh, validly instituted appeal under the governing constitutional appellate provision, so the application was not entertainable for want of jurisdiction. On court-fee, a plaint seeking damages for wrongful dismissal or, alternatively, arrears of pay was treated as alternative reliefs on the same cause of action, not as two distinct causes of action. Court-fee was therefore to be assessed on the alternative-relief basis, with fixed fee on the declaratory relief and ad valorem fee on the higher alternative claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Oct 1942 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289057