https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289057 The Federal Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an application to vary a decree of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, emphasizing that its inherent powers can only be exercised when a valid appeal is properly instituted before it. The Court clarified that complaints against the decree post-remand should be addressed through an independent appeal under Section 205. Additionally, the Court acknowledged concerns regarding arrears of pay and court fees but dismissed the petition, indicating that these issues should be pursued through separate remedies. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 1942 00:00:00 +0630 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:35:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289057 The Federal Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an application to vary a decree of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, emphasizing that its inherent powers can only be exercised when a valid appeal is properly instituted before it. The Court clarified that complaints against the decree post-remand should be addressed through an independent appeal under Section 205. Additionally, the Court acknowledged concerns regarding arrears of pay and court fees but dismissed the petition, indicating that these issues should be pursued through separate remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Oct 1942 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289057