https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289049 The court dismissed Revision Application No. 347 of 1962, affirming that the District Court acted within its jurisdiction as a Court of Law. Despite non-compliance with Section 56B, the appointment validity was upheld as it did not cause substantial injustice. The Charity Commissioner's revision application (No. 349 of 1962) was denied, with costs awarded to the Commissioner from the trust funds. en-us Mon, 12 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:04:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289049 The court dismissed Revision Application No. 347 of 1962, affirming that the District Court acted within its jurisdiction as a Court of Law. Despite non-compliance with Section 56B, the appointment validity was upheld as it did not cause substantial injustice. The Charity Commissioner's revision application (No. 349 of 1962) was denied, with costs awarded to the Commissioner from the trust funds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289049