https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289049 A scheme referring to the "District Court," read with surrounding clauses, was construed to vest appointment power in the court as a judicial authority, not in the District Judge as persona designata, so revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure was available. A proceeding to appoint a trustee or committee member of a public trust was treated as a legal proceeding affecting a public religious or charitable purpose, so notice to the Charity Commissioner was mandatory under Section 56B of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. Even so, where no real prejudice was shown and the Commissioner did not oppose the appointment, the omission of notice did not justify revisional interference. en-us Mon, 12 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:04:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289049 A scheme referring to the "District Court," read with surrounding clauses, was construed to vest appointment power in the court as a judicial authority, not in the District Judge as persona designata, so revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure was available. A proceeding to appoint a trustee or committee member of a public trust was treated as a legal proceeding affecting a public religious or charitable purpose, so notice to the Charity Commissioner was mandatory under Section 56B of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. Even so, where no real prejudice was shown and the Commissioner did not oppose the appointment, the omission of notice did not justify revisional interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289049