https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289047 Territorial jurisdiction was treated as capable of waiver under Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and a suit validly instituted before territorial reorganisation was not rendered a nullity; the parties having submitted to the court's jurisdiction, the final decree could not be impeached collaterally. On the merits, erasures in the agreement, together with correspondence and oral evidence, supported the view that only four velis were intended to be conveyed and that one veli remained with the mortgagors. The claim was treated as one for recovery of land rather than specific performance, so limitation did not bar the relief. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289047 Territorial jurisdiction was treated as capable of waiver under Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and a suit validly instituted before territorial reorganisation was not rendered a nullity; the parties having submitted to the court's jurisdiction, the final decree could not be impeached collaterally. On the merits, erasures in the agreement, together with correspondence and oral evidence, supported the view that only four velis were intended to be conveyed and that one veli remained with the mortgagors. The claim was treated as one for recovery of land rather than specific performance, so limitation did not bar the relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jan 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289047