https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289047 The Kumbakonam Sub-Court retained jurisdiction to pass the final decree despite the transfer of jurisdiction over the mortgaged property. The plaintiff's waiver of objection to territorial jurisdiction barred him from challenging it later. The court found evidence of document tampering in the agreement and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recover one veli of land. The suit was not time-barred as it aimed to recover property to which the plaintiff was entitled. The court partially allowed the appeal, granting the plaintiff recovery of one veli of land and costs, while dismissing the related appeal. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289047 The Kumbakonam Sub-Court retained jurisdiction to pass the final decree despite the transfer of jurisdiction over the mortgaged property. The plaintiff's waiver of objection to territorial jurisdiction barred him from challenging it later. The court found evidence of document tampering in the agreement and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recover one veli of land. The suit was not time-barred as it aimed to recover property to which the plaintiff was entitled. The court partially allowed the appeal, granting the plaintiff recovery of one veli of land and costs, while dismissing the related appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jan 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289047