<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (4) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289045</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the arbitration agreement between the Indian company and the foreign entity was valid and enforceable under the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937. The High Court&#039;s decision was deemed incorrect, and the case was remanded for further proceedings in the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (4) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289045</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the arbitration agreement between the Indian company and the foreign entity was valid and enforceable under the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937. The High Court&#039;s decision was deemed incorrect, and the case was remanded for further proceedings in the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>