<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1288 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289043</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act and consequential re-assessment for the year 2001-02. The Court held that as the orders were passed in Mumbai concerning a respondent based there, the High Court of Karnataka lacked jurisdiction. It emphasized that if the appellant is a separate entity from the other respondent Society, the orders against the latter would not bind the appellant. The Court concluded that the civil court would not be unduly influenced by income tax findings, especially as the matter was before the Supreme Court, and thus, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1288 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289043</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act and consequential re-assessment for the year 2001-02. The Court held that as the orders were passed in Mumbai concerning a respondent based there, the High Court of Karnataka lacked jurisdiction. It emphasized that if the appellant is a separate entity from the other respondent Society, the orders against the latter would not bind the appellant. The Court concluded that the civil court would not be unduly influenced by income tax findings, especially as the matter was before the Supreme Court, and thus, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>