<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (7) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289039</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the Repealing Act, finding it constitutional and within the legislative competence of the Bombay State Legislature. It determined that the trust properties should revert to the estate of the First Baronet, ultimately benefiting the Fourth Baronet as intended by the First Baronet. The appeal by the Custodian of Evacuee Property was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:01:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (7) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289039</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the Repealing Act, finding it constitutional and within the legislative competence of the Bombay State Legislature. It determined that the trust properties should revert to the estate of the First Baronet, ultimately benefiting the Fourth Baronet as intended by the First Baronet. The appeal by the Custodian of Evacuee Property was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>