<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 210 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396541</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Ld.AO for disallowed business expenses. The ITAT found that the penalty proceedings lacked clarity as the grounds for penalty imposition were not specified in the assessment order. Consequently, the penalty order was quashed, and both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 210 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396541</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Ld.AO for disallowed business expenses. The ITAT found that the penalty proceedings lacked clarity as the grounds for penalty imposition were not specified in the assessment order. Consequently, the penalty order was quashed, and both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>