https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289019 For court-fee purposes, the plaint must be read by its substance: where an injunction cannot be granted unless an asserted title is first displaced, a declaration is not surplusage. A suit seeking declaration that a will is void together with injunction against interference is therefore treated as a declaratory suit with consequential relief under Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The second proviso applies to the property component capable of valuation under Section 7(v), including immovable property and agricultural land, while a cash component may be valued separately by the plaintiff. The suit was consequently treated as undervalued for court-fee and jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 24 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:54:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289019 For court-fee purposes, the plaint must be read by its substance: where an injunction cannot be granted unless an asserted title is first displaced, a declaration is not surplusage. A suit seeking declaration that a will is void together with injunction against interference is therefore treated as a declaratory suit with consequential relief under Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The second proviso applies to the property component capable of valuation under Section 7(v), including immovable property and agricultural land, while a cash component may be valued separately by the plaintiff. The suit was consequently treated as undervalued for court-fee and jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289019