<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 899 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289011</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to allow exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, ruling that if multiple residential units are used as a single residential house, they qualify for exemption. The Tribunal rejected the argument that purchasing flats under separate agreements rendered them ineligible for exemption, emphasizing the usage of the units as a single residential house as the determining factor for eligibility under section 54.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 899 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289011</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to allow exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, ruling that if multiple residential units are used as a single residential house, they qualify for exemption. The Tribunal rejected the argument that purchasing flats under separate agreements rendered them ineligible for exemption, emphasizing the usage of the units as a single residential house as the determining factor for eligibility under section 54.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>