<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 108 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22704</link>
    <description>The court held that there was no direct or indirect transfer of assets by the assessee to his minor children or for their benefit. The creation of Lalitha Trust and the reallocation of profit shares were not attributable to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal correctly deleted the addition of the share income of Lalitha Trust from the assessee&#039;s assessment, ruling in favor of the assessee with costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:06:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 108 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22704</link>
      <description>The court held that there was no direct or indirect transfer of assets by the assessee to his minor children or for their benefit. The creation of Lalitha Trust and the reallocation of profit shares were not attributable to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal correctly deleted the addition of the share income of Lalitha Trust from the assessee&#039;s assessment, ruling in favor of the assessee with costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>