https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289006 Preventive detention was not vitiated by the State's prompt disposal of the detenu's representation, as there was no undue or inordinate delay on the facts stated. An allegation that blanks in the detention order were filled after signing was rejected because the order being on a cyclostyled form with particulars added in ink did not, by itself, prove post-signature alteration. The grounds of detention were also held sufficiently specific, since they set out the date, time, place, nature of the activity, and seizure particulars needed to enable an effective representation; omission of associates' names did not make the grounds vague. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:24:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289006 Preventive detention was not vitiated by the State's prompt disposal of the detenu's representation, as there was no undue or inordinate delay on the facts stated. An allegation that blanks in the detention order were filled after signing was rejected because the order being on a cyclostyled form with particulars added in ink did not, by itself, prove post-signature alteration. The grounds of detention were also held sufficiently specific, since they set out the date, time, place, nature of the activity, and seizure particulars needed to enable an effective representation; omission of associates' names did not make the grounds vague. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289006