https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289000 A cinema partnership formed to run exhibitions under a licence in the plaintiff's name was treated as unlawful because the licence condition barred assignment, subletting, transfer, or allowing another person to use the licensed premises for exhibition. The illegality was held to invalidate the arrangement so far as it related to the cinema business, and because that was the only business contemplated, the entire partnership was void ab initio. Equitable relief was not available unconditionally; however, restitutionary directions were considered necessary to protect defendants who had advanced funds. The plaintiff's declaration was therefore linked to repayment of those advances, with interest and a charge over the partnership assets. en-us Fri, 23 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 13:05:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289000 A cinema partnership formed to run exhibitions under a licence in the plaintiff's name was treated as unlawful because the licence condition barred assignment, subletting, transfer, or allowing another person to use the licensed premises for exhibition. The illegality was held to invalidate the arrangement so far as it related to the cinema business, and because that was the only business contemplated, the entire partnership was void ab initio. Equitable relief was not available unconditionally; however, restitutionary directions were considered necessary to protect defendants who had advanced funds. The plaintiff's declaration was therefore linked to repayment of those advances, with interest and a charge over the partnership assets. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289000