<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288999</link>
    <description>Direct tax under the Payment of Bonus Act is computed as a prior charge on gross-profits and prior charges without first deducting bonus payable for the same accounting year, so the Tribunal&#039;s contrary computation of allocable surplus was incorrect. Amounts already earmarked from reserves for dividend cannot remain part of reserves for return calculations, and doubtful debts treated as a provision, together with patent fees, plant transfer charges and disallowable rent treated as capital items, were correctly added back in gross-profit computation. On that basis, the award of 20% bonus and the direction of set on could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288999</link>
      <description>Direct tax under the Payment of Bonus Act is computed as a prior charge on gross-profits and prior charges without first deducting bonus payable for the same accounting year, so the Tribunal&#039;s contrary computation of allocable surplus was incorrect. Amounts already earmarked from reserves for dividend cannot remain part of reserves for return calculations, and doubtful debts treated as a provision, together with patent fees, plant transfer charges and disallowable rent treated as capital items, were correctly added back in gross-profit computation. On that basis, the award of 20% bonus and the direction of set on could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>