https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288998 Additional evidence in appeal may be received only within the narrow limits of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC; failure to record reasons under sub-rule (2) is not by itself fatal if admissibility is otherwise shown under sub-rule (1). The burden then lies on the party relying on the evidence to justify its reception, and the evidence here was upheld. Order 41 Rule 33 CPC is wide but discretionary and should be used cautiously; it does not ordinarily justify blanket relief for non-appealing defendants in a suit involving distinct claims, absent special circumstances. The appellate court's broad dismissal was therefore not sustained beyond the proper appellate relief. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 12:42:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288998 Additional evidence in appeal may be received only within the narrow limits of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC; failure to record reasons under sub-rule (2) is not by itself fatal if admissibility is otherwise shown under sub-rule (1). The burden then lies on the party relying on the evidence to justify its reception, and the evidence here was upheld. Order 41 Rule 33 CPC is wide but discretionary and should be used cautiously; it does not ordinarily justify blanket relief for non-appealing defendants in a suit involving distinct claims, absent special circumstances. The appellate court's broad dismissal was therefore not sustained beyond the proper appellate relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288998