<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Consistent Accounting Practices: Progress Billing Shouldn&#039;t Alter Method Despite Completion Percentages Discrepancy.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53958</link>
    <description>Revenue recognition - accounting process - Simply because progress billing was more than the stage of percentage of completion, the same, in itself, could not be the basis to usurp the consistent method of accounting being followed by the assessee. - Additions made by AO deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 10:22:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 10:22:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Consistent Accounting Practices: Progress Billing Shouldn&#039;t Alter Method Despite Completion Percentages Discrepancy.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53958</link>
      <description>Revenue recognition - accounting process - Simply because progress billing was more than the stage of percentage of completion, the same, in itself, could not be the basis to usurp the consistent method of accounting being followed by the assessee. - Additions made by AO deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 10:22:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>