<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 186 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396517</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the concerned authorities to decide on the refund claim within four weeks, even without all required documents submitted by the petitioners. The court noted that the de-freezing of the bank account had been addressed by the respondents. The petitioners were granted liberty to file an application under the Code of Criminal Procedure for the release of the seized goods, with directions for release upon approval by the Trial Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 186 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396517</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the concerned authorities to decide on the refund claim within four weeks, even without all required documents submitted by the petitioners. The court noted that the de-freezing of the bank account had been addressed by the respondents. The petitioners were granted liberty to file an application under the Code of Criminal Procedure for the release of the seized goods, with directions for release upon approval by the Trial Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>