<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (1) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288993</link>
    <description>A partner&#039;s share of agricultural income from a registered firm was to be computed separately, and the available deductions depended on the agricultural income tax provisions. Interest on borrowed capital used to acquire a tea estate did not qualify under section 5(k) because that provision applied only where borrowed funds were actually spent on the land itself. The interest was, however, not capital expenditure or personal expense and was treated as an expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the land under section 5(e). The deduction was therefore allowable in computing the partner&#039;s agricultural income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 10:02:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (1) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288993</link>
      <description>A partner&#039;s share of agricultural income from a registered firm was to be computed separately, and the available deductions depended on the agricultural income tax provisions. Interest on borrowed capital used to acquire a tea estate did not qualify under section 5(k) because that provision applied only where borrowed funds were actually spent on the land itself. The interest was, however, not capital expenditure or personal expense and was treated as an expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the land under section 5(e). The deduction was therefore allowable in computing the partner&#039;s agricultural income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>