https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396514 The Appellant, a distributor of BSNL's cellular products, faced a dispute regarding the chargeability of distributor's margin to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. The Adjudication Order and Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the tax demand, but the Appellant argued that the transactions were for sale/purchase of goods. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, stating that the transactions were trading activities without an additional service element. The Orders demanding service tax were set aside, and the Appeals were allowed based on established legal principles and precedents. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:58:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396514 The Appellant, a distributor of BSNL's cellular products, faced a dispute regarding the chargeability of distributor's margin to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. The Adjudication Order and Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the tax demand, but the Appellant argued that the transactions were for sale/purchase of goods. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, stating that the transactions were trading activities without an additional service element. The Orders demanding service tax were set aside, and the Appeals were allowed based on established legal principles and precedents. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396514